Loading report..

Highlight Samples

This report has flat image plots that won't be highlighted.
See the documentation for help.

Regex mode off

    Rename Samples

    This report has flat image plots that won't be renamed.
    See the documentation for help.

    Click here for bulk input.

    Paste two columns of a tab-delimited table here (eg. from Excel).

    First column should be the old name, second column the new name.

    Regex mode off

      Show / Hide Samples

      This report has flat image plots that won't be hidden.
      See the documentation for help.

      Regex mode off

        Export Plots

        px
        px
        X

        Download the raw data used to create the plots in this report below:

        Note that additional data was saved in Dwinell_GRCr8_final_multiQC_report_data when this report was generated.


        Choose Plots

        If you use plots from MultiQC in a publication or presentation, please cite:

        MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report
        Philip Ewels, Måns Magnusson, Sverker Lundin and Max Käller
        Bioinformatics (2016)
        doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
        PMID: 27312411

        Save Settings

        You can save the toolbox settings for this report to the browser.


        Load Settings

        Choose a saved report profile from the dropdown box below:

        Tool Citations

        Please remember to cite the tools that you use in your analysis.

        To help with this, you can download publication details of the tools mentioned in this report:

        About MultiQC

        This report was generated using MultiQC, version 1.18

        You can see a YouTube video describing how to use MultiQC reports here: https://youtu.be/qPbIlO_KWN0

        For more information about MultiQC, including other videos and extensive documentation, please visit http://multiqc.info

        You can report bugs, suggest improvements and find the source code for MultiQC on GitHub: https://github.com/ewels/MultiQC

        MultiQC is published in Bioinformatics:

        MultiQC: Summarize analysis results for multiple tools and samples in a single report
        Philip Ewels, Måns Magnusson, Sverker Lundin and Max Käller
        Bioinformatics (2016)
        doi: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btw354
        PMID: 27312411

        A modular tool to aggregate results from bioinformatics analyses across many samples into a single report.

        Report generated on 2026-02-07, 01:10 CST based on data in: /scratch/g/akwitek/wdemos/Dwinell_GRCr8


        General Statistics

        Showing 384/384 rows and 6/9 columns.
        Sample Name% Alignable, M% AlignedM Aligned% Dups% GCM Seqs
        167_1GM
        93.8%
        167_1GM_1
        73.4%
        49%
        40.2
        167_1GM_2
        69.7%
        49%
        40.2
        167_1GM_STAR
        91.9%
        37.0
        167_1LRFP
        93.3%
        167_1LRFP_1
        72.2%
        48%
        38.0
        167_1LRFP_2
        68.3%
        49%
        38.0
        167_1LRFP_STAR
        90.1%
        34.2
        167_1THY
        92.9%
        167_1THY_1
        63.6%
        48%
        42.6
        167_1THY_2
        58.9%
        48%
        42.6
        167_1THY_STAR
        90.0%
        38.3
        167_2GM
        92.1%
        167_2GM_1
        79.3%
        50%
        51.4
        167_2GM_2
        74.3%
        50%
        51.4
        167_2GM_STAR
        90.3%
        46.5
        167_2LRFP
        94.0%
        167_2LRFP_1
        69.4%
        49%
        34.2
        167_2LRFP_2
        66.5%
        49%
        34.2
        167_2LRFP_STAR
        91.3%
        31.2
        167_2THY
        93.6%
        167_2THY_1
        62.2%
        48%
        45.8
        167_2THY_2
        58.9%
        48%
        45.8
        167_2THY_STAR
        90.7%
        41.5
        237_5GM
        88.7%
        237_5GM_1
        69.4%
        49%
        34.1
        237_5GM_2
        63.6%
        48%
        34.1
        237_5GM_STAR
        87.3%
        29.8
        237_5LRFP
        94.3%
        237_5LRFP_1
        67.0%
        48%
        40.6
        237_5LRFP_2
        63.7%
        48%
        40.6
        237_5LRFP_STAR
        92.5%
        37.6
        237_5THY
        94.2%
        237_5THY_1
        58.2%
        47%
        45.1
        237_5THY_2
        54.7%
        47%
        45.1
        237_5THY_STAR
        91.9%
        41.4
        237_6GM
        93.9%
        237_6GM_1
        76.0%
        49%
        43.7
        237_6GM_2
        73.5%
        49%
        43.7
        237_6GM_STAR
        92.0%
        40.2
        237_6LRFP
        92.2%
        237_6LRFP_1
        67.3%
        48%
        43.6
        237_6LRFP_2
        63.9%
        48%
        43.6
        237_6LRFP_STAR
        90.5%
        39.4
        237_6THY
        93.8%
        237_6THY_1
        54.8%
        48%
        44.8
        237_6THY_2
        51.9%
        48%
        44.8
        237_6THY_STAR
        91.2%
        40.9
        263_1GM
        94.5%
        263_1GM_1
        77.9%
        50%
        60.7
        263_1GM_2
        76.0%
        50%
        60.7
        263_1GM_STAR
        92.7%
        56.3
        263_1LK
        94.2%
        263_1LK_1
        73.4%
        48%
        58.1
        263_1LK_2
        71.3%
        48%
        58.1
        263_1LK_STAR
        92.2%
        53.5
        263_1THY
        93.3%
        263_1THY_1
        65.8%
        49%
        58.5
        263_1THY_2
        63.5%
        49%
        58.5
        263_1THY_STAR
        90.4%
        52.9
        263_2GM
        93.6%
        263_2GM_1
        77.0%
        51%
        53.8
        263_2GM_2
        74.9%
        51%
        53.8
        263_2GM_STAR
        91.9%
        49.4
        263_2LK
        82.2%
        263_2LK_1
        70.3%
        48%
        42.3
        263_2LK_2
        62.4%
        47%
        42.3
        263_2LK_STAR
        79.7%
        33.7
        263_2THY
        95.8%
        263_2THY_1
        63.1%
        49%
        54.4
        263_2THY_2
        61.4%
        49%
        54.4
        263_2THY_STAR
        93.2%
        50.7
        263_3GM
        92.4%
        263_3GM_1
        76.2%
        51%
        45.1
        263_3GM_2
        72.8%
        50%
        45.1
        263_3GM_STAR
        90.9%
        41.0
        263_3LK
        92.4%
        263_3LK_1
        70.9%
        48%
        38.3
        263_3LK_2
        67.5%
        48%
        38.3
        263_3LK_STAR
        90.4%
        34.6
        263_3THY
        89.1%
        263_3THY_1
        66.4%
        49%
        49.4
        263_3THY_2
        62.3%
        49%
        49.4
        263_3THY_STAR
        86.8%
        42.8
        265_1GM
        92.4%
        265_1GM_1
        75.6%
        49%
        47.7
        265_1GM_2
        71.9%
        49%
        47.7
        265_1GM_STAR
        90.5%
        43.1
        265_1LK
        95.2%
        265_1LK_1
        74.3%
        48%
        49.8
        265_1LK_2
        71.7%
        48%
        49.8
        265_1LK_STAR
        91.6%
        45.6
        265_1THY
        92.1%
        265_1THY_1
        60.9%
        48%
        49.5
        265_1THY_2
        57.5%
        48%
        49.5
        265_1THY_STAR
        90.3%
        44.7
        265_2GM
        93.8%
        265_2GM_1
        72.1%
        50%
        25.3
        265_2GM_2
        69.3%
        50%
        25.3
        265_2GM_STAR
        91.9%
        23.2
        265_2LK
        93.8%
        265_2LK_1
        71.9%
        48%
        47.9
        265_2LK_2
        69.2%
        48%
        47.9
        265_2LK_STAR
        90.7%
        43.5
        265_2THY
        93.4%
        265_2THY_1
        65.3%
        49%
        54.3
        265_2THY_2
        62.8%
        49%
        54.3
        265_2THY_STAR
        90.1%
        49.0
        265_3GM
        93.4%
        265_3GM_1
        79.4%
        51%
        59.8
        265_3GM_2
        76.8%
        51%
        59.8
        265_3GM_STAR
        91.7%
        54.8
        265_3LK
        91.1%
        265_3LK_1
        71.9%
        47%
        46.2
        265_3LK_2
        67.4%
        47%
        46.2
        265_3LK_STAR
        88.4%
        40.9
        265_3THY
        91.8%
        265_3THY_1
        65.8%
        49%
        69.1
        265_3THY_2
        61.6%
        49%
        69.1
        265_3THY_STAR
        90.2%
        62.3
        265_4GM
        95.4%
        265_4GM_1
        77.6%
        50%
        64.2
        265_4GM_2
        76.1%
        50%
        64.2
        265_4GM_STAR
        93.4%
        60.0
        265_4LK
        95.0%
        265_4LK_1
        72.9%
        48%
        50.3
        265_4LK_2
        70.5%
        48%
        50.3
        265_4LK_STAR
        91.8%
        46.2
        265_4THY
        94.9%
        265_4THY_1
        58.0%
        49%
        28.3
        265_4THY_2
        55.1%
        49%
        28.3
        265_4THY_STAR
        92.0%
        26.1
        346_2GM
        91.5%
        346_2GM_1
        77.5%
        50%
        44.6
        346_2GM_2
        72.6%
        50%
        44.6
        346_2GM_STAR
        88.9%
        39.6
        346_2LRFP
        88.2%
        346_2LRFP_1
        70.6%
        48%
        43.0
        346_2LRFP_2
        63.7%
        48%
        43.0
        346_2LRFP_STAR
        84.7%
        36.4
        346_2THY
        92.2%
        346_2THY_1
        57.9%
        48%
        40.7
        346_2THY_2
        54.0%
        48%
        40.7
        346_2THY_STAR
        89.7%
        36.5
        346_3GM
        93.4%
        346_3GM_1
        73.5%
        49%
        47.7
        346_3GM_2
        69.8%
        49%
        47.7
        346_3GM_STAR
        91.1%
        43.5
        346_3LRFP
        90.0%
        346_3LRFP_1
        68.9%
        48%
        39.0
        346_3LRFP_2
        63.1%
        48%
        39.0
        346_3LRFP_STAR
        87.2%
        34.0
        346_3THY
        86.4%
        346_3THY_1
        58.9%
        48%
        39.8
        346_3THY_2
        53.4%
        48%
        39.8
        346_3THY_STAR
        84.6%
        33.7
        346_4GM
        84.9%
        346_4GM_1
        74.4%
        49%
        40.9
        346_4GM_2
        65.4%
        49%
        40.9
        346_4GM_STAR
        83.7%
        34.2
        346_4LRFP
        91.0%
        346_4LRFP_1
        69.0%
        48%
        40.9
        346_4LRFP_2
        63.4%
        47%
        40.9
        346_4LRFP_STAR
        88.0%
        35.9
        346_4THY
        84.1%
        346_4THY_1
        58.2%
        48%
        40.2
        346_4THY_2
        51.9%
        48%
        40.2
        346_4THY_STAR
        83.8%
        33.7
        346_5GM
        93.3%
        346_5GM_1
        70.6%
        49%
        44.1
        346_5GM_2
        66.8%
        49%
        44.1
        346_5GM_STAR
        91.3%
        40.3
        346_5LRFP
        95.0%
        346_5LRFP_1
        68.4%
        49%
        37.8
        346_5LRFP_2
        66.3%
        48%
        37.8
        346_5LRFP_STAR
        92.9%
        35.1
        346_5THY
        91.5%
        346_5THY_1
        60.1%
        48%
        44.4
        346_5THY_2
        56.1%
        48%
        44.4
        346_5THY_STAR
        89.1%
        39.6
        346_6GM
        91.0%
        346_6GM_1
        74.5%
        49%
        39.1
        346_6GM_2
        69.4%
        49%
        39.1
        346_6GM_STAR
        88.9%
        34.8
        346_6LRFP
        91.1%
        346_6LRFP_1
        69.4%
        48%
        35.4
        346_6LRFP_2
        64.2%
        48%
        35.4
        346_6LRFP_STAR
        88.3%
        31.3
        346_6THY
        91.5%
        346_6THY_1
        64.7%
        48%
        42.8
        346_6THY_2
        60.6%
        48%
        42.8
        346_6THY_STAR
        88.2%
        37.8
        384_1GM
        94.1%
        384_1GM_1
        77.0%
        50%
        43.3
        384_1GM_2
        73.9%
        50%
        43.3
        384_1GM_STAR
        91.9%
        39.7
        384_1LRFP
        86.1%
        384_1LRFP_1
        67.5%
        48%
        33.3
        384_1LRFP_2
        59.6%
        47%
        33.3
        384_1LRFP_STAR
        85.2%
        28.4
        384_1THY
        86.6%
        384_1THY_1
        73.9%
        48%
        44.6
        384_1THY_2
        66.6%
        47%
        44.6
        384_1THY_STAR
        85.6%
        38.2
        394_3GM
        95.3%
        394_3GM_1
        78.7%
        50%
        46.2
        394_3GM_2
        75.0%
        50%
        46.2
        394_3GM_STAR
        92.2%
        42.6
        394_3LRFP
        87.8%
        394_3LRFP_1
        73.3%
        48%
        41.1
        394_3LRFP_2
        66.0%
        47%
        41.1
        394_3LRFP_STAR
        85.3%
        35.0
        394_3THY
        94.9%
        394_3THY_1
        59.5%
        48%
        37.5
        394_3THY_2
        56.4%
        48%
        37.5
        394_3THY_STAR
        92.0%
        34.5
        394_4GM
        95.7%
        394_4GM_1
        72.4%
        50%
        32.0
        394_4GM_2
        70.3%
        50%
        32.0
        394_4GM_STAR
        93.0%
        29.8
        394_4LRFP
        95.6%
        394_4LRFP_1
        71.4%
        48%
        43.0
        394_4LRFP_2
        68.3%
        49%
        43.0
        394_4LRFP_STAR
        93.3%
        40.1
        394_4THY
        94.3%
        394_4THY_1
        60.8%
        48%
        48.7
        394_4THY_2
        58.1%
        48%
        48.7
        394_4THY_STAR
        91.6%
        44.6
        394_5GM
        94.5%
        394_5GM_1
        81.2%
        50%
        44.8
        394_5GM_2
        77.8%
        50%
        44.8
        394_5GM_STAR
        90.1%
        40.4
        394_5LRFP
        94.7%
        394_5LRFP_1
        75.0%
        48%
        46.7
        394_5LRFP_2
        72.1%
        48%
        46.7
        394_5LRFP_STAR
        91.8%
        42.9
        394_5THY
        95.3%
        394_5THY_1
        67.2%
        49%
        47.6
        394_5THY_2
        64.5%
        49%
        47.6
        394_5THY_STAR
        89.1%
        42.4
        394_6GM
        97.2%
        394_6GM_1
        74.1%
        50%
        39.0
        394_6GM_2
        72.6%
        50%
        39.0
        394_6GM_STAR
        94.7%
        37.0
        394_6LRFP
        96.7%
        394_6LRFP_1
        69.6%
        48%
        33.4
        394_6LRFP_2
        67.1%
        48%
        33.4
        394_6LRFP_STAR
        92.8%
        31.0
        394_6THY
        96.3%
        394_6THY_1
        61.2%
        48%
        44.6
        394_6THY_2
        58.6%
        48%
        44.6
        394_6THY_STAR
        93.2%
        41.5
        394_7GM
        96.0%
        394_7GM_1
        73.3%
        50%
        40.4
        394_7GM_2
        70.9%
        50%
        40.4
        394_7GM_STAR
        93.6%
        37.8
        394_7LRFP
        95.7%
        394_7LRFP_1
        71.6%
        49%
        40.0
        394_7LRFP_2
        69.6%
        49%
        40.0
        394_7LRFP_STAR
        91.6%
        36.6
        394_7THY
        94.2%
        394_7THY_1
        60.5%
        49%
        44.4
        394_7THY_2
        57.7%
        49%
        44.4
        394_7THY_STAR
        91.4%
        40.5
        394_8GM
        94.6%
        394_8GM_1
        76.1%
        50%
        47.7
        394_8GM_2
        72.8%
        50%
        47.7
        394_8GM_STAR
        92.5%
        44.1
        394_8LRFP
        93.4%
        394_8LRFP_1
        81.0%
        48%
        48.2
        394_8LRFP_2
        77.0%
        48%
        48.2
        394_8LRFP_STAR
        88.1%
        42.5
        394_8THY
        93.4%
        394_8THY_1
        62.4%
        48%
        36.5
        394_8THY_2
        56.7%
        49%
        36.5
        394_8THY_STAR
        90.4%
        33.0
        510_1GM
        96.2%
        510_1GM_1
        75.9%
        50%
        50.7
        510_1GM_2
        74.4%
        50%
        50.7
        510_1GM_STAR
        93.3%
        47.3
        510_1LK
        96.8%
        510_1LK_1
        72.1%
        48%
        45.7
        510_1LK_2
        70.9%
        48%
        45.7
        510_1LK_STAR
        93.2%
        42.6
        510_1THY
        95.6%
        510_1THY_1
        66.9%
        49%
        60.9
        510_1THY_2
        65.1%
        49%
        60.9
        510_1THY_STAR
        92.1%
        56.1
        510_2GM
        91.0%
        510_2GM_1
        75.5%
        51%
        39.4
        510_2GM_2
        72.7%
        51%
        39.4
        510_2GM_STAR
        88.8%
        35.0
        510_2LK
        93.6%
        510_2LK_1
        72.9%
        48%
        45.4
        510_2LK_2
        70.6%
        48%
        45.4
        510_2LK_STAR
        90.3%
        41.0
        510_2THY
        92.6%
        510_2THY_1
        62.1%
        49%
        40.5
        510_2THY_2
        59.1%
        49%
        40.5
        510_2THY_STAR
        89.8%
        36.3
        510_3GM
        93.4%
        510_3GM_1
        74.4%
        50%
        37.8
        510_3GM_2
        71.7%
        50%
        37.8
        510_3GM_STAR
        91.2%
        34.5
        510_3LK
        92.6%
        510_3LK_1
        78.0%
        49%
        40.0
        510_3LK_2
        73.7%
        49%
        40.0
        510_3LK_STAR
        88.6%
        35.4
        510_3THY
        95.1%
        510_3THY_1
        67.6%
        49%
        44.8
        510_3THY_2
        65.3%
        49%
        44.8
        510_3THY_STAR
        90.7%
        40.6
        510_4GM
        94.2%
        510_4GM_1
        76.2%
        50%
        49.3
        510_4GM_2
        73.3%
        50%
        49.3
        510_4GM_STAR
        91.9%
        45.3
        510_4LK
        94.7%
        510_4LK_1
        70.9%
        48%
        53.4
        510_4LK_2
        68.7%
        48%
        53.4
        510_4LK_STAR
        92.4%
        49.4
        510_4THY
        93.7%
        510_4THY_1
        65.4%
        49%
        45.9
        510_4THY_2
        63.3%
        49%
        45.9
        510_4THY_STAR
        90.3%
        41.4
        510_5GM
        90.2%
        510_5GM_1
        82.0%
        51%
        40.4
        510_5GM_2
        77.9%
        50%
        40.4
        510_5GM_STAR
        87.9%
        35.5
        510_5LK
        92.0%
        510_5LK_1
        70.5%
        48%
        45.0
        510_5LK_2
        67.8%
        48%
        45.0
        510_5LK_STAR
        89.2%
        40.2
        510_5THY
        90.7%
        510_5THY_1
        62.5%
        49%
        26.1
        510_5THY_2
        58.4%
        49%
        26.1
        510_5THY_STAR
        87.4%
        22.8
        510_6GM
        88.8%
        510_6GM_1
        79.4%
        51%
        43.6
        510_6GM_2
        74.7%
        51%
        43.6
        510_6GM_STAR
        85.8%
        37.4
        510_6LK
        95.1%
        510_6LK_1
        75.4%
        47%
        78.9
        510_6LK_2
        73.1%
        47%
        78.9
        510_6LK_STAR
        92.7%
        73.2
        510_6THY
        94.0%
        510_6THY_1
        60.8%
        49%
        30.9
        510_6THY_2
        58.4%
        50%
        30.9
        510_6THY_STAR
        90.3%
        27.9
        510_7GM
        92.8%
        510_7GM_1
        79.5%
        50%
        61.4
        510_7GM_2
        76.4%
        50%
        61.4
        510_7GM_STAR
        90.9%
        55.8
        510_7LK
        94.1%
        510_7LK_1
        63.8%
        48%
        25.5
        510_7LK_2
        60.8%
        48%
        25.5
        510_7LK_STAR
        92.1%
        23.5
        510_7THY
        91.1%
        510_7THY_1
        62.5%
        49%
        52.1
        510_7THY_2
        59.4%
        49%
        52.1
        510_7THY_STAR
        89.2%
        46.5
        586_1GM
        91.9%
        586_1GM_1
        76.9%
        50%
        41.4
        586_1GM_2
        73.4%
        50%
        41.4
        586_1GM_STAR
        90.0%
        37.3
        586_1LK
        95.1%
        586_1LK_1
        67.3%
        48%
        26.6
        586_1LK_2
        64.2%
        48%
        26.6
        586_1LK_STAR
        93.0%
        24.7
        586_1THY
        93.1%
        586_1THY_1
        63.1%
        49%
        40.9
        586_1THY_2
        60.4%
        49%
        40.9
        586_1THY_STAR
        89.9%
        36.8
        730_1GM
        89.8%
        730_1GM_1
        75.8%
        50%
        40.6
        730_1GM_2
        70.8%
        50%
        40.6
        730_1GM_STAR
        88.4%
        35.9
        730_1LK
        88.7%
        730_1LK_1
        71.1%
        50%
        54.1
        730_1LK_2
        66.5%
        50%
        54.1
        730_1LK_STAR
        87.0%
        47.1
        730_1THY
        88.2%
        730_1THY_1
        66.7%
        50%
        49.9
        730_1THY_2
        62.5%
        50%
        49.9
        730_1THY_STAR
        86.0%
        42.9

        Rsem

        Rsem RSEM (RNA-Seq by Expectation-Maximization) is a software package forestimating gene and isoform expression levels from RNA-Seq data.DOI: 10.1186/1471-2105-12-323.

        Mapped Reads

        A breakdown of how all reads were aligned for each sample.

        loading..

        Multimapping rates

        A frequency histogram showing how many reads were aligned to n reference regions.

        In an ideal world, every sequence reads would align uniquely to a single location in the reference. However, due to factors such as repeititve sequences, short reads and sequencing errors, reads can be align to the reference 0, 1 or more times. This plot shows the frequency of each factor of multimapping. Good samples should have the majority of reads aligning once.

        loading..

        STAR

        STAR is an ultrafast universal RNA-seq aligner.DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/bts635.

        Alignment Scores

        loading..

        FastQ Screen

        Version: 0.15.1

        FastQ Screen allows you to screen a library of sequences in FastQ format against a set of sequence databases so you can see if the composition of the library matches with what you expect.DOI: 10.12688/f1000research.15931.2.

        Mapped Reads

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        FastQC

        Version: 0.11.9

        FastQC is a quality control tool for high throughput sequence data, written by Simon Andrews at the Babraham Institute in Cambridge.

        Sequence Counts

        Sequence counts for each sample. Duplicate read counts are an estimate only.

        This plot show the total number of reads, broken down into unique and duplicate if possible (only more recent versions of FastQC give duplicate info).

        You can read more about duplicate calculation in the FastQC documentation. A small part has been copied here for convenience:

        Only sequences which first appear in the first 100,000 sequences in each file are analysed. This should be enough to get a good impression for the duplication levels in the whole file. Each sequence is tracked to the end of the file to give a representative count of the overall duplication level.

        The duplication detection requires an exact sequence match over the whole length of the sequence. Any reads over 75bp in length are truncated to 50bp for this analysis.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Sequence Quality Histograms

        The mean quality value across each base position in the read.

        To enable multiple samples to be plotted on the same graph, only the mean quality scores are plotted (unlike the box plots seen in FastQC reports).

        Taken from the FastQC help:

        The y-axis on the graph shows the quality scores. The higher the score, the better the base call. The background of the graph divides the y axis into very good quality calls (green), calls of reasonable quality (orange), and calls of poor quality (red). The quality of calls on most platforms will degrade as the run progresses, so it is common to see base calls falling into the orange area towards the end of a read.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Per Sequence Quality Scores

        The number of reads with average quality scores. Shows if a subset of reads has poor quality.

        From the FastQC help:

        The per sequence quality score report allows you to see if a subset of your sequences have universally low quality values. It is often the case that a subset of sequences will have universally poor quality, however these should represent only a small percentage of the total sequences.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Per Base Sequence Content

        The proportion of each base position for which each of the four normal DNA bases has been called.

        To enable multiple samples to be shown in a single plot, the base composition data is shown as a heatmap. The colours represent the balance between the four bases: an even distribution should give an even muddy brown colour. Hover over the plot to see the percentage of the four bases under the cursor.

        To see the data as a line plot, as in the original FastQC graph, click on a sample track.

        From the FastQC help:

        Per Base Sequence Content plots out the proportion of each base position in a file for which each of the four normal DNA bases has been called.

        In a random library you would expect that there would be little to no difference between the different bases of a sequence run, so the lines in this plot should run parallel with each other. The relative amount of each base should reflect the overall amount of these bases in your genome, but in any case they should not be hugely imbalanced from each other.

        It's worth noting that some types of library will always produce biased sequence composition, normally at the start of the read. Libraries produced by priming using random hexamers (including nearly all RNA-Seq libraries) and those which were fragmented using transposases inherit an intrinsic bias in the positions at which reads start. This bias does not concern an absolute sequence, but instead provides enrichement of a number of different K-mers at the 5' end of the reads. Whilst this is a true technical bias, it isn't something which can be corrected by trimming and in most cases doesn't seem to adversely affect the downstream analysis.

        Click a sample row to see a line plot for that dataset.
        Rollover for sample name
        Position: -
        %T: -
        %C: -
        %A: -
        %G: -

        Per Sequence GC Content

        The average GC content of reads. Normal random library typically have a roughly normal distribution of GC content.

        From the FastQC help:

        This module measures the GC content across the whole length of each sequence in a file and compares it to a modelled normal distribution of GC content.

        In a normal random library you would expect to see a roughly normal distribution of GC content where the central peak corresponds to the overall GC content of the underlying genome. Since we don't know the the GC content of the genome the modal GC content is calculated from the observed data and used to build a reference distribution.

        An unusually shaped distribution could indicate a contaminated library or some other kinds of biased subset. A normal distribution which is shifted indicates some systematic bias which is independent of base position. If there is a systematic bias which creates a shifted normal distribution then this won't be flagged as an error by the module since it doesn't know what your genome's GC content should be.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Per Base N Content

        The percentage of base calls at each position for which an N was called.

        From the FastQC help:

        If a sequencer is unable to make a base call with sufficient confidence then it will normally substitute an N rather than a conventional base call. This graph shows the percentage of base calls at each position for which an N was called.

        It's not unusual to see a very low proportion of Ns appearing in a sequence, especially nearer the end of a sequence. However, if this proportion rises above a few percent it suggests that the analysis pipeline was unable to interpret the data well enough to make valid base calls.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Sequence Length Distribution

        The distribution of fragment sizes (read lengths) found. See the FastQC help

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Sequence Duplication Levels

        The relative level of duplication found for every sequence.

        From the FastQC Help:

        In a diverse library most sequences will occur only once in the final set. A low level of duplication may indicate a very high level of coverage of the target sequence, but a high level of duplication is more likely to indicate some kind of enrichment bias (eg PCR over amplification). This graph shows the degree of duplication for every sequence in a library: the relative number of sequences with different degrees of duplication.

        Only sequences which first appear in the first 100,000 sequences in each file are analysed. This should be enough to get a good impression for the duplication levels in the whole file. Each sequence is tracked to the end of the file to give a representative count of the overall duplication level.

        The duplication detection requires an exact sequence match over the whole length of the sequence. Any reads over 75bp in length are truncated to 50bp for this analysis.

        In a properly diverse library most sequences should fall into the far left of the plot in both the red and blue lines. A general level of enrichment, indicating broad oversequencing in the library will tend to flatten the lines, lowering the low end and generally raising other categories. More specific enrichments of subsets, or the presence of low complexity contaminants will tend to produce spikes towards the right of the plot.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Overrepresented sequences by sample

        The total amount of overrepresented sequences found in each library.

        FastQC calculates and lists overrepresented sequences in FastQ files. It would not be possible to show this for all samples in a MultiQC report, so instead this plot shows the number of sequences categorized as overrepresented.

        Sometimes, a single sequence may account for a large number of reads in a dataset. To show this, the bars are split into two: the first shows the overrepresented reads that come from the single most common sequence. The second shows the total count from all remaining overrepresented sequences.

        From the FastQC Help:

        A normal high-throughput library will contain a diverse set of sequences, with no individual sequence making up a tiny fraction of the whole. Finding that a single sequence is very overrepresented in the set either means that it is highly biologically significant, or indicates that the library is contaminated, or not as diverse as you expected.

        FastQC lists all the sequences which make up more than 0.1% of the total. To conserve memory only sequences which appear in the first 100,000 sequences are tracked to the end of the file. It is therefore possible that a sequence which is overrepresented but doesn't appear at the start of the file for some reason could be missed by this module.

        Flat image plot. Toolbox functions such as highlighting / hiding samples will not work (see the docs).


        Top overrepresented sequences

        Top overrepresented sequences across all samples. The table shows 20 most overrepresented sequences across all samples, ranked by the number of samples they occur in.

        Showing 8/8 rows and 3/3 columns.
        Overrepresented sequenceSamplesOccurrences% of all reads
        GGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGGG
        96
        22842735
        0.2674%
        NNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN
        3
        167412
        0.0020%
        CCTCACCCGGCCCGGACACGGACAGGATTGACAGATTGATAGCTCTTTCT
        1
        44556
        0.0005%
        CTTCGAATGTGTGGTAGGGTGGGGGGCATCCATGCAGTCATTCTAGGTTA
        1
        62348
        0.0007%
        GCCGTAAGTGAGATGAATGAGCCTATAGAGGAGACTGTATTTCATGTGGT
        1
        54538
        0.0006%
        GGGGGTTCGAATCCTTCCTTTCTTATTTAACTTTTACGTAGGAAGGTTCT
        1
        50150
        0.0006%
        CTCCGATTAGATGCATTAATAGATGGCCTGCTGTAATGTTTGCTGTTAGT
        1
        43822
        0.0005%
        GTCAGTATCATGCTGCGGCTTCAAATCCGAAATGATGTTTTGATGTGAAG
        1
        43556
        0.0005%

        Adapter Content

        The cumulative percentage count of the proportion of your library which has seen each of the adapter sequences at each position.

        Note that only samples with ≥ 0.1% adapter contamination are shown.

        There may be several lines per sample, as one is shown for each adapter detected in the file.

        From the FastQC Help:

        The plot shows a cumulative percentage count of the proportion of your library which has seen each of the adapter sequences at each position. Once a sequence has been seen in a read it is counted as being present right through to the end of the read so the percentages you see will only increase as the read length goes on.

        No samples found with any adapter contamination > 0.1%

        Status Checks

        Status for each FastQC section showing whether results seem entirely normal (green), slightly abnormal (orange) or very unusual (red).

        FastQC assigns a status for each section of the report. These give a quick evaluation of whether the results of the analysis seem entirely normal (green), slightly abnormal (orange) or very unusual (red).

        It is important to stress that although the analysis results appear to give a pass/fail result, these evaluations must be taken in the context of what you expect from your library. A 'normal' sample as far as FastQC is concerned is random and diverse. Some experiments may be expected to produce libraries which are biased in particular ways. You should treat the summary evaluations therefore as pointers to where you should concentrate your attention and understand why your library may not look random and diverse.

        Specific guidance on how to interpret the output of each module can be found in the relevant report section, or in the FastQC help.

        In this heatmap, we summarise all of these into a single heatmap for a quick overview. Note that not all FastQC sections have plots in MultiQC reports, but all status checks are shown in this heatmap.

        loading..

        Software Versions

        Software Versions lists versions of software tools extracted from file contents.

        SoftwareVersion
        FastQ Screen0.15.1
        FastQC0.11.9